mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: [bisect] NFS regression breaks X
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 18:03:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178748206.6760.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46423D62.2070200@garzik.org>

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Original bug report, with hardware and software info:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/8/667
> 
> I love bisect :)  bisect has identified the following commit as the one 
> that causes my GNOME login to die, within 10 seconds of logging in:
> 
> 	commit 2bea90d43a050bbc4021d44e59beb34f384438db
> 	Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> 	Date:   Thu Mar 29 16:47:53 2007 -0400
> 
> 	SUNRPC: RPC buffer size estimates are too large
> 
> 100% reproducible, verified regression.  My home directory is an NFSv4 
> mount, and the problem appears on my client workstation, so this makes 
> some sense:
> > sunrpc on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw)
> > pretzel:/ on /g type nfs4 (rw,noatime,proto=tcp,addr=10.10.10.1)

Known issue. Could you try applying the commit at

http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=nfs-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ce7dc940701cf3fde3c6e826a696b333092cbb1;hp=aa3d1faebe6e214cd96be0e587571477ff6fd9fc

and see if that suffices to fix the issue?

> 
> As an aside, let me express the hope that the NFS developers develop 
> better patch creation methods.  My bisect compile repeatedly died at
> 
> >   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> >   CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
> >   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
> > fs/nfs/pagelist.c:239: error: conflicting types for ‘nfs_pageio_init’
> > include/linux/nfs_page.h:80: error: previous declaration of ‘nfs_pageio_init’ was here
> > make[2]: *** [fs/nfs/pagelist.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [fs/nfs] Error 2
> > make: *** [fs] Error 2
> 
> which indicates that someone on the NFS team did not create 
> wholly-contained patches when submitted to the kernel.  Build breakage 
> should not be fixed in a later commit (unless the breakage already went 
> upstream), because -- as we see here -- it breaks bisection.
> 
> 	Jeff, occasionally guilty of same, and trying to reform

The problem is that the above only appears to break on 64-bit compiles.
gcc gave no errors at all on a 386, and so the problem was detected only
after the merge.

Cheers
  Trond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-09 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-09 21:30 Jeff Garzik
2007-05-09 21:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-09 22:17   ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-09 22:48   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-09 22:03 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-05-09 22:52   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10  0:10     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-10 13:36       ` Chuck Lever
2007-05-11 22:54       ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178748206.6760.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®