From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759612AbXEKIlA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 04:41:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754293AbXEKIks (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 04:40:48 -0400 Received: from mail.sjtu.org ([202.120.5.34]:21811 "ehlo appsrv1.sjtu.org" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754888AbXEKIkq (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 04:40:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l: saa7134: support ir-remote for 10moons TM300 From: Tony Wan To: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, michael@mihu.de, video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1178869883.7163.2.camel@gnome.local> References: <1178852562.7216.4.camel@wankai.sjtu.org> <1178869883.7163.2.camel@gnome.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:38:43 +0800 Message-Id: <1178872723.5020.7.camel@wankai.sjtu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-7.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 11:51 +0400, Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote: > Great, now another correction, sorry for not noticing it before. With > correction of bit 0x4 -> 0x2 your remote is exactly the same as > ir_codes_encore_enltv so probably there is sense just to reuse old > codes. Elencore mask should be reduced too. I also wonder aren't we > talking about the same card here. > > It's interesting. I checked the source code, but I don't think that Elencore and TM300 is the same card. In fact, they have different tuner modules. Or they use the same ir-remote?