From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:27:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179181659.3703.99.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4648DBE4.9000903@goop.org>
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:00 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well, let's get the build fix in place first and then we can feed
> > the cleanup in later on, in a more leisurely fashion?
> >
>
> If you like. Are all the Voyager users standing outside your office
> with pitchforks, demanding satisfaction?
That could be arranged ... The Xensource offices are just up the road
from Google, you know if I wanted to kill two birds with one stone.
Seriously, though, although I tolerate voyager breakage through the
merge window, I actively try to clean it up and have a working voyager
for the next release. There's no real excuse for not fixing build
breakage. How it's done, I don't really care. The only blocker for the
two patch smp consolidation + voyager fix was Andi ... if he's relaxing
that, then we can go that route.
Until this is fixed, there are going to be -rc testers firing off build
failure reports, which I think we'd all like to
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 16:08 James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 17:22 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 19:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:27 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2007-05-14 22:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 22:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1179181659.3703.99.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®