Re: [PATCH] Chaining sg lists for big IO commands v5

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>]

On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 01:01 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Chaining sg lists for big IO commands v5
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:39:44 -0500
> 
> > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 21:44 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > (cc's added)
> > > 
> > > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Chaining sg lists for big IO commands v5
> > > Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:05:54 +0200
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, May 24 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-bidi.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb2747a9f2465ac4a1ea9e3533b92510fbcaae0c
> > > > > 
> > > > > Neat, will take a look! I should be able to just reuse that.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW, when do you plan on pushing the SCSI sg update? I'd love for it to
> > > > be soon, so I can just rebase the sglist branch on that and get rid of
> > > > the SCSI stuff in there.
> > > 
> > > Well, all I can say is that I'd love James to push the cleanups
> > > patchset soon too.
> > 
> > I'll put the accessor one into scsi-misc.  I'll try to get the other 40
> > reviewed via the scsi-pending tree that Mark Salyzyn suggested ... give
> > me some time on that.
> 
> Thanks. Do you want me to send the patches to scsi-ml or you directly
> get them via the git tree?

Either works ... but for 40 patches it was easier for me to fetch into a
git branch and cherry pick the two that can go into scsi-misc now.

I'm just correcting a compile warning on the 53c700 one, then I'll push.

James