From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Rodrigo Luiz <troops.of.doom@gmail.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>,
Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v2
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181412502.4404.359.camel@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466AE606.7020704@googlemail.com>
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:40 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239
> Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>
> Handled-By : Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>
> Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Status : problem is being debugged
Please remove this. The behavior is correct and it just affects buggy
applications like iperf, which used usleep(0) as a yield. iperf is fixed
by now.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-09 17:40 Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-09 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-06-12 15:02 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-13 14:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-13 18:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1181412502.4404.359.camel@chaos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxi@daemonizer.de \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=troops.of.doom@gmail.com \
--cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome