From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764109AbXFKFVR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:21:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754922AbXFKFVI (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:21:08 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:42720 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753630AbXFKFVF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:21:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch-mm 01/23] NOHZ: Fix ARM,SH,SPARC64 idle nohz handling From: Thomas Gleixner To: Paul Mundt Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Arjan van de Ven , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Chris Wright , Adam Belay , Len Brown , Dave Miller , Russell King In-Reply-To: <20070611002614.GA20676@linux-sh.org> References: <20070610092437.118387863@inhelltoy.tec.linutronix.de> <20070610092446.402212606@inhelltoy.tec.linutronix.de> <20070611002614.GA20676@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:20:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1181539259.8176.40.camel@chaos> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:26 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > There are two paths here depending on hlt/nohlt setting, we need to have > tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() for the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG case, too. Do you really want to run through that in every loop iteration ? If you have nohlt, then nohz is rather pointless. tglx