mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rajeev Mishra <rajeevm@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] loopback block device on top of block devices don't work anymore
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 13:55:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182267c-d291-47bc-8e5f-2e11aa93421b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aK9c5jJepHEWIONM@gardel-login>

On 8/27/25 1:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
> 
> Recent kernels fail if it is attempted to create a loopback block
> device on top of a block device (rather than a regular file), which is a
> feature long supported on Linux kernels, and that systemd relies on
> (specifically, systemd-repart does).
> 
> For example, this used to work:
> 
> losetup --find --show --offset=4096 --sizelimit=409600 /dev/nvme0n1
> 
> But now it doesn't anymore...
> 
> This is on 6.17rc3. My educated guess is that this is caused by
> Rajeev's 8aa5a3b68ad144da49a3d17f165e6561255e3529, which tightened the
> screws on validating the backing file's size, which now fails if the
> backing file isn't actually a file, but a block device.
> 
> (But I didn't spend more time tracking this down.)

Yeah sorry about that, the problem is the followup to the commit
you mentioned, and the fix for that is here:

https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-6.17&id=d14469ed7c00314fe8957b2841bda329e4eaf4ab

and will land in -rc4.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-27 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 19:30 Lennart Poettering
2025-08-27 19:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1182267c-d291-47bc-8e5f-2e11aa93421b@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=rajeevm@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®