From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761964AbXF0UT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:19:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753530AbXF0UTV (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:19:21 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49164 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751466AbXF0UTU (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:19:20 -0400 Subject: Re: ZERO_PAGE() vs. loadable modules in Redhat 4.4 i386 kernels ... From: Arjan van de Ven To: Casey Leedom Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <951709.47871.qm@web30502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <951709.47871.qm@web30502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:18:02 -0700 Message-Id: <1182975482.2800.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 11:53 -0700, Casey Leedom wrote: > --- Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > you forgot to attach your source code or provide a URL to it..... > > Sorry, my bad. I'm just diving into Linux for the first time and wasn't > aware of the protocols. Here's the code fragment I'm currently using: code fragments are only very limited useful because they don't compile... use the power of open source and just post your entire source code.. (and it's open source, right?) you sort of gave too little, we can't see how this is being used for example..