From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1761585AbXGCVU4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1761585AbXGCVU4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:20:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755220AbXGCVUs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:20:48 -0400
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:58773 "EHLO gate.crashing.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751005AbXGCVUr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:20:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, rjw@sisk.pl, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       pavel@ucw.cz, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net
In-Reply-To: <200707032132.20731.oliver@neukum.org>
References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org>
	 <200707032026.34649.oliver@neukum.org>
	 <E1I5no4-0004fU-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
	 <200707032132.20731.oliver@neukum.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:20:15 +1000
Message-Id: <1183497615.3388.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:32 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this can't be made atomic, but assuming, that it
> > can't, fuse should still not need to be implicated.  If it is,
> that's
> > an indication about something wrong in the suspend procedure.
> 
> Nope, something's wrong in fuse. You must be able to deal with sync
> until every task is frozen. 

Pipe dream

Ben.