From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762408AbXGCVl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:41:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762121AbXGCVlp (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:41:45 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:35893 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762073AbXGCVlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:41:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alan Stern , Pavel Machek In-Reply-To: <200707032332.49694.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org> <200707031456.40890.rjw@sisk.pl> <1183497290.3388.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200707032332.49694.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:35:55 +1000 Message-Id: <1183498555.3388.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 23:32 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Still, do you really think that we're ready to drop it _right_ _now_ > (I'm > referring to suspend only) and if so than on what basis (except that > you > don't like it, which falls short of being a techical argument)? Works fine for me without it ;-) Ben.