From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761971AbXGEWmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:42:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759414AbXGEWlx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:41:53 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36875 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759373AbXGEWlx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:41:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Miklos Szeredi , paulus@samba.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, johannes@sipsolutions.net, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org In-Reply-To: <200707051048.46202.oliver@neukum.org> References: <18059.10554.955290.148535@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200707051024.23528.oliver@neukum.org> <200707051048.46202.oliver@neukum.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 08:38:15 +1000 Message-Id: <1183675095.3388.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > There is that. > > OK, bite the bullet. Tasks involved in fuse are special. Give them a flag > and teach the freezer to put them on ice only after all other task are > frozen. In a way they are kernel, there's no use denying that. Yet another ugly hack to work around the fact that the freezer cannot work reliably ... yuck Why not spend that energy fixing drivers to properly block requests instead ? Ben.