From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756858AbXGFNPS (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:15:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751484AbXGFNPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:15:05 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:40066 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467AbXGFNPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:15:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction From: Peter Zijlstra To: Pavel Emelianov Cc: Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Linux Containers , Paul Menage , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kirill Korotaev In-Reply-To: <468CB658.7000204@openvz.org> References: <20070704222108.17702.40293.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> <468CB658.7000204@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:14:50 +0200 Message-Id: <1183727690.7054.104.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:14 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote: > Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must. This I still disagree upon. Page-cache limits are orthogonal to containers and not a requirement for containers. If you want such a feature get it in Linux proper and don't sneak it in the backdoor via containers.