From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753929AbXGGQWm (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:22:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751383AbXGGQWe (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:22:34 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:35292 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbXGGQWe (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:22:34 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches v2 From: David Woodhouse To: Michal Piotrowski Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Adrian Bunk , Patrick Caulfield , David Teigland , bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Marcel Holtmann , Jiri Kosina , Dmitry Torokhov In-Reply-To: <468FBA20.8060509@googlemail.com> References: <468FBA20.8060509@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:23:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1183825391.3066.59.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 18:06 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > FBDEV > > Subject : SLUB kmalloc-32768: Poison check failed@0xc1e20000 > slab 0xc04de400 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/4/305 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : David Woodhouse > Caused-By : ? > Handled-By : ? > Status : unknown If you're looking for someone to blame, consider the fact that this has gone away now I've switched back to slab. :) > Bluetooth > > Subject : problem with a bluetooth mouse > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/4/321 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : David Woodhouse > Caused-By : ? > Handled-By : Jiri Kosina > Dmitry Torokhov > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/6/391 > Status : patch available That patch was a straw man for Marcel to comment on, not necessarily a real fix. I don't know the code that well, and naïvely reordering bits of it could have introduced another race which I just haven't triggered yet. Strictly speaking, it wasn't a 2.6.22 regression either -- I actually saw it for the first time in 2.6.21-rc iirc. Thanks for tracking these, btw. It's very useful. -- dwmw2