From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761539AbXGKKSZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:18:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758386AbXGKKSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:18:18 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:60416 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757899AbXGKKSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:18:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] try_module_get usage From: Rusty Russell To: Fernando Luis =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1zquez?= Cao Cc: dedekind@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1184140531.4608.16.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp> References: <1184140531.4608.16.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:18:01 +1000 Message-Id: <1184149081.6005.606.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:55 +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: > I keep seeing uses of try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) which seem to mimic > the behavior of the former MOD_INC_USE_COUNT. The UBI driver is one > example: > > int ubi_get_device_info(int ubi_num, struct ubi_device_info *di) > { > const struct ubi_device *ubi; > > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > return -ENODEV; Yes, this code is wrong. Thanks, Rusty.