From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934477AbXGMVrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:47:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758381AbXGMVrN (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:47:13 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:43961 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756367AbXGMVrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:47:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp From: Mingming Cao Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com To: Kalpak Shah Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger In-Reply-To: <1184310318.4372.5.camel@garfield> References: <1183275416.4010.125.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070710163027.1bf7e94e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184245126.4299.20.camel@garfield> <4696FFBE.3030806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1184310318.4372.5.camel@garfield> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:46:58 -0700 Message-Id: <1184363218.16045.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-33.el5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > > Kalpak Shah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > >> Mingming Cao wrote: > > >> > > >>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > >> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > > >> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to > > >> write a proper changelog for this patch. > > > > > > The incremental patch contains a proper changelog describing the patch. > > > > > > > > > Instead of putting incremental patches it would be nice if we can have replacement patches. > > for the already existing patches with the comments addressed. For example if we have a > > review comment on the patch message ( commit log ) then adding an incremental patch doesn't help. > > I think that it would be easier to review just the changes that have > been made to the patches instead of having people go through the entire > patch again. I was hoping that someone with write access to ext4-git > would update the commit logs. > > If replacement patches are preferred, then I will send them again. > No need, I already fold your fix patch to the parent patches, so in the updated ext4-patch-queue it saved the updated nanosecond patch. > Thanks, > Kalpak. > > > > > > > -aneesh > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >