From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759317AbXGNHtV (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:49:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751922AbXGNHtP (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:49:15 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:47690 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751920AbXGNHtO (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:49:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ICH Force HPET: ICH5 quirk to force detect enable From: Thomas Gleixner To: Robert Hancock Cc: Venki Pallipadi , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <46987CAD.9020209@shaw.ca> References: <46987CAD.9020209@shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:49:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1184399350.12353.334.camel@chaos> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 01:35 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > According to some reports, and a quick test I did on my laptop, this > same method appears to work on the ICH4 chipset, even though the HPET is > not documented on that chipset. Does Intel have any info on HPET support > on ICH4 and whether there's any reason we should not force enable it > there as well? There is a patch for ICH4 in my hrt queue: http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/ tglx