From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758821AbXGWOcS (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:32:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753060AbXGWOcH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:32:07 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:34156 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752278AbXGWOcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:32:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Dynamically allocated pageflags. From: Arjan van de Ven To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <200707232305.12364.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> References: <200707232305.12364.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:29:55 -0700 Message-Id: <1185200995.2714.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-1.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. > > As we all know, pageflags have been a scarce resource for a while now. These > patches seek to help address that issue by adding support for a new type > of 'dynamically allocated' pageflag. but... does this really solve it? I mean.. you can still run out... so then what?