From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763328AbXGYGsR (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:48:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754156AbXGYGsD (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:48:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54064 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752059AbXGYGsB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:48:01 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//aUZdyhv/7SXZr4EPy9Zej2Onw5Vba6/r2qHmrJ UciI9FLoWrjcwM Subject: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 From: Mike Galbraith To: Matthew Hawkins Cc: Nick Piggin , Eric St-Laurent , Ray Lee , Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck list , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Jackson , Andrew Morton , Rene Herman In-Reply-To: References: <20070710013152.ef2cd200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <9a8748490707231608h453eefffx68b9c391897aba70@mail.gmail.com> <46A57068.3070701@yahoo.com.au> <2c0942db0707232153j3670ef31kae3907dff1a24cb7@mail.gmail.com> <46A58B49.3050508@yahoo.com.au> <2c0942db0707240915h56e007e3l9110e24a065f2e73@mail.gmail.com> <46A6CC56.6040307@yahoo.com.au> <46A6D7D2.4050708@gmail.com> <1185341449.7105.53.camel@perkele> <46A6E1A1.4010508@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:47:56 +0200 Message-Id: <1185346076.6528.12.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:19 +1000, Matthew Hawkins wrote: > On 7/25/07, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Not to say that neither fix some problems, but for such conceptually > > big changes, it should take a little more effort than a constructed test > > case and no consideration of the alternatives to get it merged. > > Swap Prefetch has existed since September 5, 2005. Please Nick, > enlighten us all with your "alternatives" which have been offered (in > practical, not theoretical form) in the past 23 months, along with > their non-constructed benchmarks proving their case and the hordes of > happy users and kernel developers who have tested them out the wazoo > and given their backing. Or just take a nice steaming jug of STFU. Heh. Here we have a VM developer expressing his interest in the problem space, and you offer him a steaming jug of STFU because he doesn't say what you want to hear. I wonder how many killfiles you just entered. -Mike