From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SCSI] aic94xx: new driver
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:39:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186763964.3335.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186761988.7615.10.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 00:06 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 08:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 23:09 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 04:00 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > > --- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
> > > > +++ b/include/scsi/scsi.h
> > > > @@ -429,4 +429,10 @@ #define SCSI_IOCTL_GET_BUS_NUMBER 0x5386
> > > > /* Used to obtain the PCI location of a device */
> > > > #define SCSI_IOCTL_GET_PCI 0x5387
> > > >
> > > > +/* Pull a u32 out of a SCSI message (using BE SCSI conventions) */
> > > > +static inline u32 scsi_to_u32(u8 *ptr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return (ptr[0]<<24) + (ptr[1]<<16) + (ptr[2]<<8) + ptr[3];
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > #endif /* _SCSI_SCSI_H */
> > >
> > > Please explain why it's necessary to export this to userspace.
> >
> > Er it's not ... but then it's not necessary to export this entire file,
> > either.
>
> That's an acceptable answer, I suppose, given that glibc ships its own
> copy of the file in question.
>
> But it does contain ioctl definitions, and if we ever added any new
> ioctls presumably they'd be added there too? It does seem to be the kind
> of thing we _do_ want to export from the kernel, surely?
Oh .. I thought we'd already got around that one by duplicating the
ioctls? Those five are all deprecated, but if that's what you want
exporting, we could separate them into a new file.
> > From the SCSI point of view, the function definitely belongs in that
> > file because it's an accessor to facilitate the processing of commands
> > and their replies, which is what that file contains ... in fact it
> > contains a lot of the internal mechanics of the SCSI layer that the user
> > shouldn't necessarily be seeing.
>
> All the more reason for us to export it for ourselves and exert some
> editorial control, perhaps?
Even if I'd known it was exported, I'm still not sure I'd have noticed
why or what the issues are.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200609240400.k8O403OJ024220@hera.kernel.org>
2007-08-10 15:09 ` David Woodhouse
2007-08-10 15:52 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-10 16:06 ` David Woodhouse
2007-08-10 16:39 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2007-08-11 3:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-11 6:41 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1186763964.3335.15.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®