mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jiale yao" <19888972804@163.com>
To: "Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:RE: Re:RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: mcp23s08: reject devices without match data
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:24:56 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186ef64.63b1.1a0e6e70a59.Coremail.19888972804@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY3PR01MB113461CE3C9EB4A175879F5BD868D2@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

At 2026-09-28 14:03:46, "Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
>Hi jiale yao,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jiale yao <19888972804@163.com>
>> Sent: 26 September 2026 11:24
>> Subject: Re:RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: mcp23s08: reject devices without match data
>> 
>> [You don't often get email from 19888972804@163.com. Learn why this is important at
>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>> 
>> Hi Biju,
>> 
>> At 2026-09-26 18:07:14, "Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
>> >> Sent: 25 September 2026 14:38
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: mcp23s08: reject devices without match data
>> >>
>> >> A device bound through driver_override need not match an entry in the
>> >> driver tables. In that case
>> >> spi_get_device_match_data() returns NULL, but mcp23s08_probe() later
>> >> passes the result to the regmap setup and dereferences it while setting up each device.
>> >
>> >I believe this is an invalid use case as the user trying
>> >driver_override and the probe returns error. Am I missing anything here?
>> 
>> Yes, my commit message was not clear enough. This patch is intended to fix a regression introduced by
>> commit 2e44555b05c0, rather than to make an unmatched device probe successfully through driver_override.
>> 
>> Before that commit, missing match data effectively resulted in type 0, which fell through to the default
>> switch case and returned -EINVAL.
>> Commit 2e44555b05c0 replaced the type value with an info pointer, but the SPI path missed the
>> corresponding NULL check before dereferencing
>> info->type. The I2C path preserved the previous error handling with an
>> explicit NULL check after the same conversion.
>
>you are testing the driver with driver_override and your patch makes driver
>Probe failure. I do not understand the test case you are trying to
>achieve with driver_override.
>
>Can you please share some logs with driver_override that you planned to test?
>
>Cheers,
>Biju 
>
>> 
>> Consequently, an unmatched device bound through driver_override used to fail cleanly. It can now cause a
>> NULL pointer dereference when a valid spi-present-mask property is present. This patch restores the
>> previous failure behavior.
>> 
>> >
>> >Can you please prepare a patch that makes the driver probe success by
>> >using driver_override Feature? Also please share some logs to see how
>> >it works in real device
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Biju


The test is NOT intended to make an unmatched device probe successfully.
driver_override permits an explicit probe attempt; it does not guarantee that probe must succeed.
The driver must still reject unsupported devices safely. The bug is that it currently crashes instead of returning an error.

I reproduced this deterministically with KASAN on arm64 QEMU.
The SPI device has an unmatched compatible and a valid microchip,spi-present-mask property, and is then bound with:

echo mcp23s08 > /sys/bus/spi/devices/spi0.0/driver_override
echo spi0.0 > /sys/bus/spi/drivers/mcp23s08/bind

KASAN reports:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017]
pc : mcp23s08_probe+0x2f8/0x944
lr : mcp23s08_probe+0x190/0x944
Call trace:
 mcp23s08_probe+0x2f8/0x944 (P)
 spi_probe+0x1c0/0x2d8
 really_probe+0x17c/0x5b8
 __driver_probe_device+0x28c/0x350
 device_driver_attach+0xa0/0x18c
 bind_store+0xc4/0x13c
 drv_attr_store+0x60/0x9c
 sysfs_kf_write+0x170/0x1e8
 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x298/0x404
 vfs_write+0x648/0x8cc
 ksys_write+0xf0/0x1e0
 __arm64_sys_write+0x70/0xa0
 invoke_syscall+0x70/0x24c


spi_get_device_match_data() returns NULL, and mcp23s08_spi_regmap_init() later dereferences info->type at offset 16.

The patch only guarantees safety; it does not attempt to support unmatched hardware through driver_override.

Cheers,
Jiale

>> >
>> >>
>> >> Reject devices without match data before reading device properties.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 2e44555b05c0 ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Simplify
>> >> probe()/mcp23s08_spi_regmap_init()")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c | 2 ++
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c
>> >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c
>> >> index bacebcff67ef..926034fcd512 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c
>> >> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>> >>      u8 v;
>> >>
>> >>      info = spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
>> >> +    if (!info)
>> >> +            return -ENODATA;
>> >>
>> >>      ret = device_property_read_u8(dev, "microchip,spi-present-mask", &v);
>> >>      if (ret) {
>> >> --
>> >> 2.34.1
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jiale

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25 13:38 Jiale Yao
2026-09-26 10:07 ` Biju Das
2026-09-26 10:23   ` jiale yao
2026-09-26 10:28     ` jiale yao
2026-09-28  6:03     ` Biju Das
2026-09-28  7:24       ` jiale yao [this message]
2026-09-28  7:32         ` Biju Das
2026-09-28  7:54           ` jiale yao
2026-09-28  8:05             ` Biju Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1186ef64.63b1.1a0e6e70a59.Coremail.19888972804@163.com \
    --to=19888972804@163.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®