From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@earthlink.net>
Cc: "\"Linux Kernel Mailing List\"" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"\"Ingo Molnar\"" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"\"\\\"Dmitry Adamushko\\\"\"" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fair for RT tasks.
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:33:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187156037.6615.17.camel@Homer.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501c7dea9$3bfca1c0$6501a8c0@earthlink.net>
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
>
> Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> missing is the RT for .task_new.
No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.
-Mike
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-15 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-14 19:28 Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-15 5:33 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187156037.6615.17.camel@Homer.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=erblichs@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®