From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: ndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:55:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187776503.3899.16.camel@raven.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46CAF484.80501@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 10:19 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Ian Kent wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to a change to fs/dcache.c:d_lookup() in the 2.6 kernel whereby only
> > hashed dentrys are returned the negative caching of mount failures
> > stopped working in the autofs4 module for nobrowse mount (ie. directory
> > created at mount time and removed at umount or following a mount
> > failure).
> >
> > This patch keeps track of the dentrys from mount fails in order to be
> > able check the timeout since the last fail and return the appropriate
> > status. In addition the timeout value is settable at load time as a
> > module option and via sysfs using the module
> > parameter /sys/module/autofs4/parameters/negative_timeout.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
> >
> > ---
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/init.c.negative-timeout 2007-07-09 07:32:17.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/init.c 2007-08-21 15:44:34.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include "autofs_i.h"
> >
> > +unsigned int negative_timeout = AUTOFS_NEGATIVE_TIMEOUT;
> > +module_param(negative_timeout, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(negative_timeout, "Cache mount fails negatively for this many seconds");
> > +
> > static int autofs_get_sb(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data, struct vfsmount *mnt)
> > {
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/inode.c.negative-timeout 2007-08-17 11:52:33.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/inode.c 2007-08-21 15:44:34.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct autofs_info *autofs4_init_ino(str
> > ino->inode = NULL;
> > ino->dentry = NULL;
> > ino->size = 0;
> > + ino->negative_timeout = negative_timeout;
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ino->rehash);
> >
> > @@ -98,11 +99,24 @@ void autofs4_free_ino(struct autofs_info
> > static void autofs4_force_release(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > struct dentry *this_parent = sbi->sb->s_root;
> > - struct list_head *next;
> > + struct list_head *p, *next;
> >
> > if (!sbi->sb->s_root)
> > return;
> >
> > + /* Cleanup the negative dentry cache */
> > + spin_lock(&sbi->rehash_lock);
> > + list_for_each_safe(p, next, &sbi->rehash_list) {
> > + struct autofs_info *ino;
> > + struct dentry *dentry;
> > + ino = list_entry(p, struct autofs_info, rehash);
> > + dentry = ino->dentry;
> > + spin_unlock(&sbi->rehash_lock);
> > + dput(ino->dentry);
> >
>
> Should this be dput(dentry);?
Addressed in this simple (first) cleanup patch.
Thanks
Ian
---
--- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/inode.c.negative-timeout-cleanup 2007-08-22 17:46:33.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/fs/autofs4/inode.c 2007-08-22 17:47:02.000000000 +0800
@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static void autofs4_force_release(struct
struct autofs_info *ino;
struct dentry *dentry;
ino = list_entry(p, struct autofs_info, rehash);
- dentry = ino->dentry;
spin_unlock(&sbi->rehash_lock);
dput(ino->dentry);
spin_lock(&sbi->rehash_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-22 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-21 9:26 Ian Kent
2007-08-21 14:19 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-22 2:49 ` Ian Kent
2007-08-22 9:55 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2007-08-22 11:05 ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2007-08-21 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-22 2:56 ` Ian Kent
2007-08-22 3:27 ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187776503.3899.16.camel@raven.themaw.net \
--to=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome