From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds full stack to critical-section tracing
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:48:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188434892.26038.23.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070810141413.12966.13475.stgit@lsg>
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 08:14 -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> ---
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++--
> kernel/latency_trace.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 8ebb43c..233d26c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1306,10 +1306,13 @@ struct task_struct {
> #endif
>
> #define MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE 25
> +#define MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE_DEPTH 5
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACE
> - unsigned long preempt_trace_eip[MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE];
> - unsigned long preempt_trace_parent_eip[MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE];
> + struct {
> + struct stack_trace trace;
> + unsigned long data[MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE_DEPTH];
> + } preempt_trace[MAX_PREEMPT_TRACE];
These changes need some fixing .. The "struct stack_trace"
infrastructure is based on CONFIG_STACKTRACE , so at least you would
want to ifdef your changes on that config options ..
I modified you patch to include the ifdefs,
ftp://source.mvista.com/pub/dwalker/misc/debug-preempt-5-levels-of-stack-frames.patch
The other problem I noticed is that the save_stack_trace(trace); seems
kind of heavy weight to be calling from inside add_preempt_count. If
your only going to a depth of 5 you could potentially use there macros,
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
# ifndef CONFIG_ARM
# define CALLER_ADDR0 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))
# define CALLER_ADDR1 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(1))
# define CALLER_ADDR2 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(2))
# define CALLER_ADDR3 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(3))
# define CALLER_ADDR4 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(4))
# define CALLER_ADDR5 ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(5))
# else
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 14:14 [PATCH 0/2] RT: Enhance PREEMPT_TRACE with deeper stacks Gregory Haskins
2007-08-10 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] Adds full stack to critical-section tracing Gregory Haskins
2007-08-30 0:48 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2007-08-10 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Some stacks show up untracable, so fall back to old method in this case Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1188434892.26038.23.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®