From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966381AbXIBMzd (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965099AbXIBMz0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:55:26 -0400 Received: from gir.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.77]:41551 "EHLO gir.skynet.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965016AbXIBMzZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:55:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask From: Mel Gorman To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: References: <20070831205139.22283.71284.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070831205319.22283.45590.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:10:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1188731404.27508.0.camel@machina.109elm.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 17:34 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Good idea. That gets rid of the GFP_THISNODE stuff that I introduced for > the memoryless node patchset. > Yes, I was fairly pleased with that. It makes the split look a little strange as an early patch makes it two zonelists and a later patch makes it one. However, there didn't seem to be a nicer way of doing it without having multi-purpose patches. Thanks -- Mel Gorman