From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965127AbXIBQMs (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:12:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755782AbXIBQMh (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:12:37 -0400 Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:47620 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755157AbXIBQMg (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:12:36 -0400 Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c From: Johannes Berg To: Christian Kujau Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PpNu+qoJvafitV2emGie" Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:13:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1188749628.4028.6.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-PpNu+qoJvafitV2emGie Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote: > but given the amount of changes currently=20 > going into net/ I thought this might be interesting: >=20 > [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595) > [15604.138807] [] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0 > [15604.139163] [] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1b/0x40 > [15604.139515] [] VNetBridgeStartPromisc+0x2b/0x50 [vmnet] Not sure why this would be interesting. Clearly, dev_set_promiscuity is called without the RTNL held while it should be. And see who the caller is? johannes --=-PpNu+qoJvafitV2emGie Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBG2uE8/ETPhpq3jKURAgySAJ98fNj90GDGG64ANwIHCJLXfpG6wQCeOQle 6laOJ4yQIOQyOBNNADc1Mg8= =Ye+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PpNu+qoJvafitV2emGie--