On ons, 2007-09-05 at 05:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:28:07 +0200 Ian Kumlien wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just had a quite unexpected 'low memory situation'... > > > > This is a AMD64 machine with 2 gig memory, running 64 bit userland. > > > > Kernel: 2.6.23-rc3-git10, updating to -rc5-* as soon as i can. > > I'm using SLUB:s > > > > > > To me, this looks odd... I thought that any cached memory would be > > reclamed but it was always full. > > > > Ideas? > > > > One example from dmesg: > > swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020 > > > > Call Trace: > > [] __alloc_pages+0x30f/0x330 > > [] __slab_alloc+0x141/0x590 > > [] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 > > [] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 > > [] __kmalloc_track_caller+0xa0/0xc0 > > [] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x150 > > [] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 > > [] :sky2:sky2_rx_alloc+0x25/0xf0 > > [] :sky2:sky2_poll+0x6dc/0xcf0 > > [] tcp_delack_timer+0x0/0x210 > > [] net_rx_action+0x8a/0x140 > > [] __do_softirq+0x69/0xe0 > > [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 > > [] do_softirq+0x35/0x90 > > [] do_IRQ+0x80/0x100 > > [] default_idle+0x0/0x40 > > [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa > > [] default_idle+0x29/0x40 > > [] cpu_idle+0xa1/0xf0 > > > > An order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocation can fail, and networking should recover > from it. Well, this isn't only networking, It started with all the apps running and ended up with a pretty basic desktop with almost nothing running... (due to continued freezes that caused me to shut down more and more programs) > If this is happening a lot then someting might have been broken. Do you > have reason to believe that the frequency of this happening has inreased? I have never, to my knowledge, had this happen before... I just happened to start a few downloads with rtorrent and watched the machine slow down to a crawl... All this with over a gig in cache. The machine was actually deadlocked for almost a minute at one time. Top memory usage: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2395 pomac 20 0 440m 289m 238m S 2 14.4 32:56.54 rtorrent 21647 root 20 0 203m 120m 10m S 1 6.0 569:45.31 X 2351 pomac 20 0 170m 111m 53m S 0 5.5 15:43.66 rtorrent At peak time, one of the rtorrent processes consumed more, but i still had 1.x gig as cache, which imho should have been reclaimed. vmstat now: procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 365204 16628 30644 1445316 2 1 362 92 18 21 4 2 91 3 PS. I have a dmesg dump from the incident, it's not long enough to contain all but it could be seen as a snapshot... DS. -- Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net