From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:19:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189185598.7636.4.camel@imap.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070907172425.GA12977@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 19:24 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> > > I did that before I posted patches to lkml.
> > > IOW: posted patches are not broken versus module loading.
> >
> > Ok, this is more like the explanation I was looking for..
> >
> > During this thread you seemed to indicate the patches you release
> > reduced the kernel ~10% , but now your saying that was pre-release ,
> > right?
>
> What are you after here?
>
> If you read the inital post you see the actual savings and you also
> can read that it works wiht modules. The precentage can be calculated
> from these numbers if you are interested.
Right, but he contradicted that during the course of this thread.. Which
is why I'm asking about it..
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-07 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-05 13:43 Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 18:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-06 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 22:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-10 12:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-10 19:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-10 19:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-11 11:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-11 11:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-05 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-06 10:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 22:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-08 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Oleg Verych
2007-09-05 18:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 20:34 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-05 21:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 11:40 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 12:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 20:43 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 20:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 21:16 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 21:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 22:01 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 22:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 12:33 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 16:29 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 18:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 18:38 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:14 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 19:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 19:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-06 10:57 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-06 17:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-07 16:31 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-07 17:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-07 17:19 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2007-09-07 17:30 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-07 17:38 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-05 19:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-05 19:27 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189185598.7636.4.camel@imap.mvista.com \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®