From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Take a u64 when checking for a valid dr7 value
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:32:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <118ad0a6-b190-80ee-98fa-615466d2bf12@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200124230722.8964-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
On 25/01/20 00:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Take a u64 instead of an unsigned long in kvm_dr7_valid() to fix a build
> warning on i386 due to right-shifting a 32-bit value by 32 when checking
> for bits being set in dr7[63:32].
>
> Alternatively, the warning could be resolved by rewriting the check to
> use an i386-friendly method, but taking a u64 fixes another oddity on
> 32-bit KVM. Beause KVM implements natural width VMCS fields as u64s to
> avoid layout issues between 32-bit and 64-bit, a devious guest can stuff
> vmcs12->guest_dr7 with a 64-bit value even when both the guest and host
> are 32-bit kernels. KVM eventually drops vmcs12->guest_dr7[63:32] when
> propagating vmcs12->guest_dr7 to vmcs02, but ideally KVM would not rely
> on that behavior for correctness.
>
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Cc: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
> Fixes: ecb697d10f70 ("KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests")
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 2d2ff855773b..3624665acee4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_pat_valid(u64 data)
> return (data | ((data & 0x0202020202020202ull) << 1)) == data;
> }
>
> -static inline bool kvm_dr7_valid(unsigned long data)
> +static inline bool kvm_dr7_valid(u64 data)
> {
> /* Bits [63:32] are reserved */
> return !(data >> 32);
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-25 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 23:07 Sean Christopherson
2020-01-24 23:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-25 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-01-26 7:49 ` Krish Sadhukhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=118ad0a6-b190-80ee-98fa-615466d2bf12@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®