From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pexu@kapsi.fi,
Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [build bug] error: 'VID_HARDWARE_GEMTEK' undeclared
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:37:00 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192473420.5240.139.camel@gaivota> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710151117260.15624@shell4.speakeasy.net>
Em Seg, 2007-10-15 às 11:27 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > randconfig testing of latest -git found this build bug:
> >
> > drivers/media/radio/radio-gemtek.c:557: error: 'VID_HARDWARE_GEMTEK' undeclared here (not in a function)
> >
> > config attached.
>
> Problem:
> # CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT is not set
>
> The VID_HARDWARE_* defines are only created if that is turned on. gemtek
> should depend on VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT.
>
> *or*
>
> As far as I can tell, these VID_HARDWARE defines are entirely useless. I
> couldn't find any instance of them being used for anything other than setting
> the .hardware field of struct video_device, and I was unable to find any
> instance of that field being used.
>
> It looks like the whole thing is just unused cruft. Mauro, would it be ok if
> I made a patch to just delete the whole mess?
Those VID_HARDWARE_* are bogus. No place checks for the .hardware value.
I've already made a patch removing it. Feel free to double check it.
--
Cheers,
Mauro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-15 11:13 Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 13:16 ` [PATCH] radio-gemtek: fix " Pekka Seppänen
2007-10-15 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 15:11 ` [build bug] error: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-10-15 15:43 ` [patch] videbuf-core.c: fix build error Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 18:27 ` [build bug] error: 'VID_HARDWARE_GEMTEK' undeclared Trent Piepho
2007-10-15 18:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192473420.5240.139.camel@gaivota \
--to=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=dougsland@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pexu@kapsi.fi \
--cc=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®