From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934083AbXJQQ0W (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:26:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753566AbXJQQ0P (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:26:15 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:48242 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751338AbXJQQ0O (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:26:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix nfs_writepage() From: Peter Zijlstra To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1192638253.7573.38.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <1192628458.27435.119.camel@twins> <1192634702.7573.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1192635028.27435.137.camel@twins> <1192635917.7573.24.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1192636074.7573.27.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1192636652.27435.147.camel@twins> <1192638253.7573.38.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:26:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1192638372.27435.154.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 12:24 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 17:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:47 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:45 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 17:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > > > The thing is, swapper_space just calls ->writepage() and expects the > > > > > page to be written out. So either the a_ops usage of swapper_space is > > > > > deviant or NFS' is. > > > > > > > > Could somebody please document WTF writepage() is supposed to do, and > > > > WTF page_mkwrite() is for? > > > > > > > > I thought that page_mkwrite() was supposed to finally allow us to deal > > > > with dirty pages in a clean manner: the caller gets to tell the > > > > filesystem that it wants the entire page written out, and then dirties > > > > the page. What is the point if the VM then expects to be able to > > > > circumvent this? > > > > > > Put differently: > > > * _who_ is dirtying the page when the swapper is trying to write > > > the page out? > > > * why are they not calling either page_mkwrite() or > > > commit_write()? > > > > I'm writing anonymous pages (I'm the crazy person doing swap over NFS). > > And anonymous is dirty by default. > > I'd really prefer to _know_ that these writes are coming from the > swapper. That makes it possible to give them a correct credential and > open context. > > Could you perhaps funnel them through a new a_op->swap_out() and default > back to ->writepage() for those filesystems that don't define it? Sure, will do that.