mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, neilb@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsv2 ref leak in 2.6.24?
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:12:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192900351.7440.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710200233.l9K2X5qx015844@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>


On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 22:33 -0400, Erez Zadok wrote:
> Trond, good news.  I was able to narrow down the problem to purely the
> client-side, probably dcache/readdir related, and I have a shell script that
> deterministically triggers the problem each time for me (this is a FC6 image
> under Vmware 6.0.1).  Here's a short shell script which reliably triggers
> the "lost files" problem -- I create a file via nfs2 on the client side, and
> sometimes it doesn't show up in readdir, but it is there if you stat it
> directly.

Ah... I got confused as to what you were measuring and where. Looking at
nfs_proc_create(), there is indeed a missing call to
nfs_mark_for_revalidate(). The reason why you need such a call being the
usual one: NFSv2 doesn't provide post-op attributes for the directory.

The patch below ought to fix the problem.

Cheers
  Trond
---------------------- CUT HERE -----------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:07:21 -0400
NFSv2: Ensure that the directory metadata gets revalidated on file create

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---

 fs/nfs/proc.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/proc.c b/fs/nfs/proc.c
index 97669ed..4f80d88 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/proc.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ nfs_proc_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *sattr,
 	nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
 	dprintk("NFS call  create %s\n", dentry->d_name.name);
 	status = rpc_call_sync(NFS_CLIENT(dir), &msg, 0);
+	nfs_mark_for_revalidate(dir);
 	if (status == 0)
 		status = nfs_instantiate(dentry, &fhandle, &fattr);
 	dprintk("NFS reply create: %d\n", status);



  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-20 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-19  5:49 Erez Zadok
2007-10-19 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-19 21:40   ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-19 21:52     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-19 22:59       ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20  2:33       ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20 17:12         ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-10-20 19:04           ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20 21:35             ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-21 16:58               ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-21 22:18                 ` Erez Zadok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192900351.7440.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®