From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, neilb@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsv2 ref leak in 2.6.24?
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:12:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192900351.7440.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710200233.l9K2X5qx015844@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 22:33 -0400, Erez Zadok wrote:
> Trond, good news. I was able to narrow down the problem to purely the
> client-side, probably dcache/readdir related, and I have a shell script that
> deterministically triggers the problem each time for me (this is a FC6 image
> under Vmware 6.0.1). Here's a short shell script which reliably triggers
> the "lost files" problem -- I create a file via nfs2 on the client side, and
> sometimes it doesn't show up in readdir, but it is there if you stat it
> directly.
Ah... I got confused as to what you were measuring and where. Looking at
nfs_proc_create(), there is indeed a missing call to
nfs_mark_for_revalidate(). The reason why you need such a call being the
usual one: NFSv2 doesn't provide post-op attributes for the directory.
The patch below ought to fix the problem.
Cheers
Trond
---------------------- CUT HERE -----------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:07:21 -0400
NFSv2: Ensure that the directory metadata gets revalidated on file create
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/proc.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/proc.c b/fs/nfs/proc.c
index 97669ed..4f80d88 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/proc.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ nfs_proc_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *sattr,
nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
dprintk("NFS call create %s\n", dentry->d_name.name);
status = rpc_call_sync(NFS_CLIENT(dir), &msg, 0);
+ nfs_mark_for_revalidate(dir);
if (status == 0)
status = nfs_instantiate(dentry, &fhandle, &fattr);
dprintk("NFS reply create: %d\n", status);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 5:49 Erez Zadok
2007-10-19 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-19 21:40 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-19 21:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-19 22:59 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20 2:33 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20 17:12 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-10-20 19:04 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-20 21:35 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-21 16:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-10-21 22:18 ` Erez Zadok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192900351.7440.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®