From: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Martin Schwidefksy <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] use virtual time for CFS on s390
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:02:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193169728.5922.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hi Ingo,
an outcome from the previous discussion about a virtual sched_clock() on s390
was that scheduler_tick() should also be called based on virtual time.
The second patch changes the scheduler_tick() call to only happen after a tick
passed for the virtual cpu.
The patches cause nothing obvious to break, numbers from top look sane but
I've seen something strange...
For a simple make -j6 workload top reports processes very often to be in
state <defunct>. Thats' not terribly wrong since this can happens also
without the patches but I wonder if this indicates that the scheduler behaves
badly and does less often schedule the parent processes that gathers the
waiting zombie processes?
Are there any indicators in the sched_debug output that I could look for?
Jan
reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193169728.5922.45.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®