mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:46:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195814816.4149.94.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)

Hi,

On my powerbook, with NO_HZ and HIGH_RES_TIMERS, I observed recently
that powernowd would not ever switch between CPU speeds.

Doing some scripting to read /proc/stat every half second and print the
differences, I get output like this on a mostly idle system:

# for reference:
# [user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal, guest]

[4, 0, 3, 46, 0, 264, 0, 0, 0]
[5, 0, 4, 41, 0, 266, 0, 0, 0]
[4, 0, 7, 37, 0, 299, 0, 0, 0]

Now starting an empty while (1) loop, I see:

[53, 0, 1, 0, 0, 243, 0, 0, 0]
[53, 0, 2, 0, 0, 224, 0, 0, 0]
[45, 0, 7, 0, 0, 249, 0, 0, 0]

As you can see, the "irq" time is very high so that "user" (mostly my
CPU burning program) only accounts for maybe 15%. This leads to
powernowd thinking that all is fine and no switching is required. Also,
the whole stuff leads to top(1) displaying about 80-90% "hi" (hard irq?
calculated as irq - softirq?) time.

Does anybody have an idea why the irq time is so high? And no, I don't
think it can actually be true, I'm seeing maybe 500 interrupts/second
(most due to USB).

johannes


             reply	other threads:[~2007-11-23 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-23 10:46 Johannes Berg [this message]
2007-11-26 16:23 ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-27  5:00   ` Tony Breeds
2007-11-27 13:42     ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-27  9:57   ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-27 13:06     ` Johannes Berg
2007-11-26 23:55 ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1195814816.4149.94.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®