From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05E9C4321E for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6BB206BB for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9A6BB206BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727530AbeIHUKi (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2018 16:10:38 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:44942 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726314AbeIHUKh (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2018 16:10:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B58814F0A1; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 15:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-123-84.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981B0101043B; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 15:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20180907161023.GF5662@atomide.com> References: <20180907161023.GF5662@atomide.com> <20180906164358.GI5659@atomide.com> <9053.1536310046@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Tony Lindgren Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11958.1536420266.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 16:24:26 +0100 Message-ID: <11959.1536420266@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:24:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:24:28 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.3' DOMAIN:'int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'dhowells@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting > > > root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a > > > filesystem superblock creation/configuration context"). > > > > Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs? > > Assuming LSM as in Documentation/lsm.txt, right not using any. The default return value for security_fs_context_parse_param() should be -ENOPARAM, both in security.h and security.c. I've fixed my tree and Al has pulled it, but we're now waiting on Stephen Rothwell to refresh linux/next. David