From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763459AbXLTXH1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:07:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754439AbXLTXHQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:07:16 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]:40740 "EHLO pat.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753005AbXLTXHO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:07:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses... From: Trond Myklebust To: Andrew Morton Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: <20071220145621.90ffb08a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1198190447.29917.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20071220145415.f737e7f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071220145621.90ffb08a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:06:24 -0500 Message-Id: <1198191984.31865.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-ClamAV-Virus: No X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.3, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.344) X-UiO-Scanned: 60135CFE0CCDA24AD31FE87A7E3FCFA78F41C013 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: -2 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 55 total 5853144 max/h 8345 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 14:56 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > btw, I think we should track this as a regression, please. It may not > strictly be a regression: the same problem might happen under 2.6.23, > although reports are only agaisnt 2.6.24-rc. > > But things which impact our ability to get clean oops reports are critical > problems. I second that opinion... Trond