From: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org,
Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 13/30] Unionfs: prevent deadlock in cache coherency
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:42:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11988745912862-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11988745841003-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Don't try to truncate_inode_pages in in purge_inode_data, because this could
lead to a deadlock between some of address_space ops and dentry
revalidation: the address space op is invoked with a lock on our own page,
and truncate_inode_pages will block on locked pages. Instead, it should be
enough to be gentler and just invalidate_mapping_pages.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index c7b6a7c..68c07ba 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -248,32 +248,22 @@ bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
}
/*
- * Purge/remove/unmap all date pages of a unionfs inode. This is called
- * when the lower inode has changed, and we have to force processes to get
- * the new data.
- *
- * XXX: Our implementation works in that as long as a user process will have
- * caused Unionfs to be called, directly or indirectly, even to just do
- * ->d_revalidate; then we will have purged the current Unionfs data and the
- * process will see the new data. For example, a process that continually
- * re-reads the same file's data will see the NEW data as soon as the lower
- * file had changed, upon the next read(2) syscall (even if the file is
- * still open!) However, this doesn't work when the process re-reads the
- * open file's data via mmap(2) (unless the user unmaps/closes the file and
- * remaps/reopens it). Once we respond to ->readpage(s), then the kernel
- * maps the page into the process's address space and there doesn't appear
- * to be a way to force the kernel to invalidate those pages/mappings, and
- * force the process to re-issue ->readpage. If there's a way to invalidate
- * active mappings and force a ->readpage, let us know please
- * (invalidate_inode_pages2 doesn't do the trick).
+ * Purge and invalidate as many data pages of a unionfs inode. This is
+ * called when the lower inode has changed, and we want to force processes
+ * to re-get the new data.
*/
static inline void purge_inode_data(struct inode *inode)
{
/* remove all non-private mappings */
unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 0);
-
- if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
- truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
+ /* invalidate as many pages as possible */
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1);
+ /*
+ * Don't try to truncate_inode_pages here, because this could lead
+ * to a deadlock between some of address_space ops and dentry
+ * revalidation: the address space op is invoked with a lock on our
+ * own page, and truncate_inode_pages will block on locked pages.
+ */
}
void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb)
--
1.5.2.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-28 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 20:42 [GIT PULL -mm] 00/30 Unionfs+fsstack updates/fixes/cleanups Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 01/30] VFS/fs_stack: drop cast on inode passed to i_size_read Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 02/30] VFS/fs_stack: use locking around i_size_write in 32-bit systems Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 03/30] Unionfs: " Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 04/30] Unionfs: clarify usage.txt read/write behavior Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 05/30] Unionfs: interpose cleanup and fix for spliced dentries Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 06/30] Unionfs: initialize inode times for reused inodes Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 07/30] Unionfs: create new special files only in first branch Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 08/30] Unionfs: create new symlinks " Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 09/30] Unionfs: release special files on copyup Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 10/30] Unionfs: mmap fixes Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 11/30] Unionfs: restructure unionfs_setattr and fix truncation order Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 12/30] Unionfs: remove custom read/write methods Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` Erez Zadok [this message]
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 14/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary conditional inode lock Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 15/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary lock when deleting whiteouts Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 16/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary lock in read_inode Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 17/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary locking in follow-link Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 18/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary parent lock in create Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 19/30] Unionfs: prevent false lockdep warnings in stacking Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 20/30] Unionfs: implement lockdep classes Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 21/30] Unionfs: minor code rearrangement in rename Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 22/30] Unionfs: handle on lower inodes in lookup Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 23/30] Unionfs: set our superblock a/m/ctime granularity Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 24/30] Unionfs: update inode times after a successful open Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:42 ` [PATCH 25/30] Unionfs: minor cleanup in check_empty Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 26/30] Unionfs: initialize namelist variable in rename Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 27/30] Unionfs: cleanup lower inodes after successful unlink Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 28/30] Unionfs: don't check dentry on error Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 29/30] Unionfs: implement d_iput method Erez Zadok
2007-12-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 30/30] Unionfs: don't check parent dentries Erez Zadok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11988745912862-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--to=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®