From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: bjdouma@xs4all.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: umount -l <path>, getcwd and /proc/<pid>/cwd inconsistent
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:29:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199698177.3156.79.camel@raven.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199696154.3156.74.camel@raven.themaw.net>
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:55 +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:29 +0100, Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> > Ian Kent wrote on 07-01-08 04:17:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me understand what's happening with, what
> > > looks like inconsistent behavior, between getpwd and procfs readlink.
> > >
> > > Basically, from a bash shell, setting working directory to a mounted
> > > directory all is fine with "pwd" and "/proc/<pid>/cwd". Following a
> > > "umount - l" on the mount "pwd" continues to return the expected string
> > > but "/proc/<pid>/cwd" returns an empty string.
> > >
> > > What I'm really after is why this happens because sys_getcwd and
> > > proc_pid_readlink appear to do essentially the same thing to get the
> > > string.
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > What does `/bin/pwd' return, when you do that instead of
> > plain `pwd' (after the umount)?
>
> I did check that at one point and it returned the same as pwd.
> I'll check again later, but I remember I explicitly checked that along
> the way.
Hey, I was sure I tested that.
It, in fact, returns nothing also.
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-07 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-07 3:17 Ian Kent
2008-01-07 8:29 ` Bauke Jan Douma
2008-01-07 8:55 ` Ian Kent
2008-01-07 9:29 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2008-01-07 10:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-01-09 3:10 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1199698177.3156.79.camel@raven.themaw.net \
--to=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=bjdouma@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®