mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	<len.brown@intel.com>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: Convert force_disable_hpet() to standard quirk
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:45:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <119b669e-aafb-4d73-e94e-ef119f909cfa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzZDLBKbDTbNr45b@feng-clx>

On 2022/9/30 9:15, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 09:05:24AM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/9/30 8:38, Feng Tang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:52:28PM +0800, Yu Liao wrote:
>>>> On 2020/12/2 15:28, Zhang Rui wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 20:21 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>> Feng,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 27 2020 at 14:11, Feng Tang wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:27:34AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:24, Feng Tang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yes, that can happen. But OTOH, we should start to think about
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> requirements for using the TSC watchdog.
>>>>>
>>>>> My original proposal is to disable jiffies and refined-jiffies as the
>>>>> clocksource watchdog, because they are not reliable and it's better to
>>>>> use clocksource that has a hardware counter as watchdog, like the patch
>>>>> below, which I didn't sent out for upstream.
>>>>>
>>>>> >From cf9ce0ecab8851a3745edcad92e072022af3dbd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:03:23 +0800
>>>>> Subject: [RFC PATCH] time/clocksource: do not use refined-jiffies as watchdog
>>>>>
>>>>> On IA platforms, if HPET is disabled, either via x86 early-quirks, or
>>>>> via kernel commandline, refined-jiffies will be used as clocksource
>>>>> watchdog in early boot phase, before acpi_pm timer registered.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not a problem if jiffies are accurate.
>>>>> But in some cases, for example, when serial console is enabled, it may
>>>>> take several milliseconds to write to the console, with irq disabled,
>>>>> frequently. Thus many ticks may become longer than it should be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Using refined-jiffies as watchdog in this case breaks the system because
>>>>> a) duration calculated by refined-jiffies watchdog is always consistent
>>>>>    with the watchdog timeout issued using add_timer(), say, around 500ms.
>>>>> b) duration calculated by the running clocksource, usually TSC on IA
>>>>>    platforms, reflects the real time cost, which may be much larger.
>>>>> This results in the running clocksource being disabled erroneously.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is reproduced on ICL because HPET is disabled in x86 early-quirks,
>>>>> and also reproduced on a KBL and a WHL platform when HPET is disabled
>>>>> via command line.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, commit fd329f276eca
>>>>> ("x86/mtrr: Skip cache flushes on CPUs with cache self-snooping") is
>>>>> another example that refined-jiffies causes the same problem when ticks
>>>>> become slow for some other reason.
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Zhang Rui, we have met the same problem as you mentioned above. I have
>>>> tested the following modification. It can solve the problem. Do you have plan
>>>> to push it to upstream ?
>>>
>>> Hi Liao Yu,
>>>
>>> Could you provoide more details? Like, what ARCH is the platform (x86
>>> or others), client or sever, if sever, how many sockets (2S/4S/8S)?
>>>
>>> The error kernel log will also be helpful.
>>
>> Hi, Feng Tang,
>>
>> It's a X86 Sever. lscpu print the following information:
>>
>> Architecture:                    x86_64
>> CPU op-mode(s):                  32-bit, 64-bit
>> Byte Order:                      Little Endian
>> Address sizes:                   46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> CPU(s):                          224
>> On-line CPU(s) list:             0-223
>> Thread(s) per core:              2
>> Core(s) per socket:              28
>> Socket(s):                       4
>> NUMA node(s):                    4
>> Vendor ID:                       GenuineIntel
>> CPU family:                      6
>> Model:                           85
>> Model name:                      Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8180 CPU @ 2.50GHz
>> Stepping:                        4
>> CPU MHz:                         3199.379
>> CPU max MHz:                     3800.0000
>> CPU min MHz:                     1000.0000
>> BogoMIPS:                        5000.00
>> Virtualization:                  VT-x
>> L1d cache:                       3.5 MiB
>> L1i cache:                       3.5 MiB
>> L2 cache:                        112 MiB
>> L3 cache:                        154 MiB
>> NUMA node0 CPU(s):               0-27,112-139
>> NUMA node1 CPU(s):               28-55,140-167
>> NUMA node2 CPU(s):               56-83,168-195
>> NUMA node3 CPU(s):               84-111,196-223
>>
>> Part of the kernel log is as follows.
>>
>> [    1.144402] smp: Brought up 4 nodes, 224 CPUs
>> [    1.144402] smpboot: Max logical packages: 4
>> [    1.144402] smpboot: Total of 224 processors activated (1121097.93 BogoMIPS)
>> [    1.520003] clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU2: Marking clocksource
>> 'tsc-early' as unstable because the skew is too large:
>> [    1.520010] clocksource:                       'refined-jiffies' wd_now:
>> fffb7210 wd_last: fffb7018 mask: ffffffff
>> [    1.520013] clocksource:                       'tsc-early' cs_now:
>> 6606717afddd0 cs_last: 66065eff88ad4 mask: ffffffffffffffff
>> [    1.520015] tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to clocksource watchdog
>> [    5.164635] node 0 initialised, 98233092 pages in 4013ms
>> [    5.209294] node 3 initialised, 98923232 pages in 4057ms
>> [    5.220001] node 2 initialised, 99054870 pages in 4068ms
>> [    5.222282] node 1 initialised, 99054870 pages in 4070ms
> 
> Thanks Xiaofeng for the info.
> 
> Could you try the below patch? It is kinda extension of 
> 
> b50db7095fe0 ("x86/tsc: Disable clocksource watchdog for TSC on qualified platorms") 
> 
> which I have run limited test on some 4 sockets Haswell and Cascadelake
> AP x86 servers.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Feng
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index cafacb2e58cc..b4ea79cb1d1a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ static void __init check_system_tsc_reliable(void)
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
>  	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) &&
>  	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST) &&
> -	    nr_online_nodes <= 2)
> +	    nr_online_nodes <= 8)
>  		tsc_disable_clocksource_watchdog();
>  }
>  
> 
Hi Feng,

I tested this patch on a previous server and it fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Yu



  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-30  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 18:19 Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-24 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-25 12:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-25 19:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-26  0:50     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-26  1:24   ` Feng Tang
2020-11-26 23:27     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-27  6:11       ` Feng Tang
2020-11-30 19:21         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01  8:34           ` Feng Tang
2020-12-02  7:28           ` Zhang Rui
2022-09-29 15:52             ` Yu Liao
2022-09-30  0:38               ` Feng Tang
2022-09-30  1:05                 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2022-09-30  1:15                   ` Feng Tang
2022-09-30  9:45                     ` Yu Liao [this message]
2022-09-30 10:13                       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-01  5:18                         ` Zhang Rui
2022-10-01 12:00                           ` Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=119b669e-aafb-4d73-e94e-ef119f909cfa@huawei.com \
    --to=liaoyu15@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome