From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf evsel: Fix missing exclude_{host,guest} setting
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 15:55:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11a4cec1-8169-0891-b9c8-4d3a7b689d86@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYbWUetkc6keL/Xa@kernel.org>
On 07-Nov-21 12:54 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:00:29AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:22 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The current logic for the perf missing feature has a bug that it can
>>>> wrongly clear some modifiers like G or H. Actually some PMUs don't
>>>> support any filtering or exclusion while others do. But we check it
>>>> as a global feature.
>>>
>>> (Sorry to pitch in bit late)
>>>
>>> AMD has one more problem on a similar line. On AMD, non-precise and
>>> precise sampling are provided by core and IBS pmu respectively. Plus,
>>> core pmu has filtering capability but IBS does not. Perf by default
>>> sets precise_ip=3 and exclude_guest=1 and goes on decreasing precise_ip
>>> with exclude_guest set until perf_event_open() succeeds. This is
>>> causing perf to always fallback to core pmu (non-precise mode) even if
>>> it's perfectly feasible to do precise sampling. Do you guys think this
>>> problem should also be addressed while designing solution for Namhyung's
>>> patch or solve it seperately like below patch:
>>>
>>> ---><---
>>>
>>> From 48808299679199c39ff737a30a7f387669314fd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:01:12 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH] perf/amd/ibs: Don't set exclude_guest by default
>>>
>>> Perf tool sets exclude_guest by default while calling perf_event_open().
>>> Because IBS does not have filtering capability, it always gets rejected
>>> by IBS PMU driver and thus perf falls back to non-precise sampling. Fix
>>> it by not setting exclude_guest by default on AMD.
>>>
>>> Before:
>>> $ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -vvv true |& grep precise
>>> precise_ip 3
>>> decreasing precise_ip by one (2)
>>> precise_ip 2
>>> decreasing precise_ip by one (1)
>>> precise_ip 1
>>> decreasing precise_ip by one (0)
>>>
>>> After:
>>> $ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -vvv true |& grep precise
>>> precise_ip 3
>>> decreasing precise_ip by one (2)
>>> precise_ip 2
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>>
>> It'd be nice if it can cover explicit -e cycles:pp as well. Anyway,
>
> Ravi, please consider Namhyung's request, a patch on top as I'm adding
> this already.
For explicit :pp modifier, evsel->precise_max does not get set and thus perf
does not try with different attr->precise_ip values while exclude_guest set.
So no issue with explicit :pp:
$ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -e cycles:pp -vvv |& grep "precise_ip\|exclude_guest"
precise_ip 2
exclude_guest 1
precise_ip 2
exclude_guest 1
switching off exclude_guest, exclude_host
precise_ip 2
^C
Also, with :P modifier, evsel->precise_max gets set but exclude_guest does
not and thus :P also works fine:
$ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -e cycles:P -vvv |& grep "precise_ip\|exclude_guest"
precise_ip 3
decreasing precise_ip by one (2)
precise_ip 2
^C
Thanks,
Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-07 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 22:49 Namhyung Kim
2021-10-31 11:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-01 21:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-02 23:08 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-02 14:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-02 23:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-03 7:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-03 7:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2021-11-03 11:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-03 17:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2021-11-03 21:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-03 22:29 ` Stephane Eranian
2021-11-04 17:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-04 21:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-03 7:21 ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-11-05 18:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-06 19:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-07 10:25 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2021-11-07 10:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-08 18:50 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11a4cec1-8169-0891-b9c8-4d3a7b689d86@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®