Re: [PATCH v8 06/31] gpu: nova-core: Hopper/Blackwell: skip GFW boot waiting

[John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>]

On 3/25/26 8:45 AM, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Wed Mar 25, 2026 at 3:52 AM GMT, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Hopper and Blackwell GPUs use FSP-based secure boot and do not
>> require waiting for GFW_BOOT completion. Move the GFW_BOOT wait
>> into a GPU HAL so the decision and the wait both live in the HAL.
>>
>> Pre-Hopper families (Tu102 HAL) wait for GFW_BOOT completion.
>> Hopper and later (Gh100 HAL) skip it and boot via FSP instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs     |  6 +++--
>>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu/hal.rs | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu/hal.rs
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
>> index e7c3860cfb28..5cef5b29cd3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu.rs
>> @@ -18,11 +18,12 @@
>>          Falcon, //
>>      },
>>      fb::SysmemFlush,
>> -    gfw,
>>      gsp::Gsp,
>>      regs,
>>  };
>>  
>> +mod hal;
>> +
>>  macro_rules! define_chipset {
>>      ({ $($variant:ident = $value:expr),* $(,)* }) =>
>>      {
>> @@ -309,10 +310,11 @@ pub(crate) fn new<'a>(
>>          spec: Spec,
>>      ) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> + 'a {
>>          let chipset = spec.chipset();
>> +        let hal = hal::gpu_hal(chipset);
>>  
>>          try_pin_init!(Self {
>>              _: {
>> -                gfw::wait_gfw_boot_completion(bar)
>> +                hal.wait_gfw_boot_completion(bar)
>>                      .inspect_err(|_| dev_err!(pdev, "GFW boot did not complete\n"))?;
>>              },
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu/hal.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu/hal.rs
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2f9e18e67a35
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/gpu/hal.rs
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +use kernel::prelude::*;
>> +
>> +use crate::{
>> +    driver::Bar0,
>> +    gfw,
>> +    gpu::{
>> +        Architecture,
>> +        Chipset, //
>> +    },
>> +};
>> +
>> +pub(crate) trait GpuHal {
>> +    /// Waits for GFW_BOOT completion if required by this hardware family.
>> +    fn wait_gfw_boot_completion(&self, bar: &Bar0) -> Result;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct Tu102;
>> +struct Gh100;
>> +
>> +impl GpuHal for Tu102 {
>> +    fn wait_gfw_boot_completion(&self, bar: &Bar0) -> Result {
>> +        gfw::wait_gfw_boot_completion(bar)
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +impl GpuHal for Gh100 {
>> +    fn wait_gfw_boot_completion(&self, _bar: &Bar0) -> Result {
>> +        Ok(())
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +const TU102: Tu102 = Tu102;
>> +const GH100: Gh100 = Gh100;
>> +
> 
> Why this instead of using `Tu102` and `Gh100` directly? They already exist in
> value namespace due to the type being unit struct.
> 

Fixed, thanks.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard

> Best,
> Gary
> 
>> +pub(super) fn gpu_hal(chipset: Chipset) -> &'static dyn GpuHal {
>> +    match chipset.arch() {
>> +        Architecture::Turing | Architecture::Ampere | Architecture::Ada => &TU102,
>> +        Architecture::Hopper | Architecture::Blackwell => &GH100,
>> +    }
>> +}
>