From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <vijayb@linux.microsoft.com>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel()
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:41:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11e852cb-911b-7f02-9471-2e05b3801770@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411092455.1461-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Hi Catalin and Will, any comments, thanks.
On 2022/4/11 17:24, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Commit 031495635b46 ("arm64: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() for
> platforms with no DMA memory zones"), this lets the kernel benifit
> due to BLOCK_MAPPINGS, we could do more if ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
> enabled.
>
> 1) Don't defer reserve_crashkernel() if only ZONE_DMA32
> 2) Don't defer reserve_crashkernel() if ZONE_DMA with dma_force_32bit
> kernel parameter(newly added)
>
> Here is another case to show the benefit of the block mapping.
>
> Unixbench benchmark result shows between the block mapping and page mapping.
> ----------------+------------------+-------------------
> | block mapping | page mapping
> ----------------+------------------+-------------------
> Process Creation| 5,030.7 | 4,711.8
> (in unixbench) | |
> ----------------+------------------+-------------------
>
> note: RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED is not enabled
>
> v3:
> - renaming crashkernel_could_early_reserve() to crashkernel_early_reserve()
> - drop dma32_phys_limit, directly use max_zone_phys(32)
> - fix no previous prototype issue
> - add RB of Vijay to patch2/3
> v2 resend:
> - fix build error reported-by lkp
> v2:
> - update patch1 according to Vijay and Florian, and RB of Vijay
> - add new patch2
>
> Kefeng Wang (3):
> arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() if only ZONE_DMA32
> arm64: mm: Don't defer reserve_crashkernel() with dma_force_32bit
> arm64: mm: Cleanup useless parameters in zone_sizes_init()
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 6 ++--
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-11 9:24 Kefeng Wang
2022-04-11 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() if only ZONE_DMA32 Kefeng Wang
2022-04-11 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: mm: Don't defer reserve_crashkernel() with dma_force_32bit Kefeng Wang
2022-04-11 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: Cleanup useless parameters in zone_sizes_init() Kefeng Wang
2022-04-27 12:41 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2022-05-03 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: mm: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 3:04 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-05 8:26 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11e852cb-911b-7f02-9471-2e05b3801770@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijayb@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®