From: "Simon Holm Thøgersen" <odie@cs.aau.dk>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: nfs server patches for 2.6.25
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:42:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201466543.5006.21.camel@odie.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080125231521.GG25141@fieldses.org>
fre, 25 01 2008 kl. 18:15 -0500, skrev J. Bruce Fields:
> Below is a summary of the nfs server patches which I expect to submit
> (any day now) for 2.6.25; please let me know if you notice anything
> wrong or missing. I'll follow up to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org with the
> full list of patches.
There are at least two patches that don't compile and break
bisectability. The errors should be obvious, just checkout and make
6f310df and 23b4e2e (patch no. 29 and 65 from the posting of the patch
set on linux-nfs).
[...]
> J. Bruce Fields (34):
> nfsd4: kill unnecessary same_name() in setclientid_confirm
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 508b256..d026c24 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -858,8 +857,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
}
} else if ((conf && !unconf) ||
((conf && unconf) &&
- (!same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &unconf->cl_verifier) ||
- !same_name(conf->cl_recdir, unconf->cl_recdir)))) {
+ !same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &unconf->cl_verifier)) {
missing ending parenthesis ---------------------------------------^
[...]
> Tom Tucker (47):
> svc: Make close transport independent
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index f86538e..6dffdda 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1912,66 +1911,63 @@ static void svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
}
/*
- * Remove a dead socket
+ * Remove a dead transport
*/
-static void
-svc_delete_socket(struct svc_sock *svsk)
+static void svc_delete_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
{
- struct svc_serv *serv;
- struct sock *sk;
-
- dprintk("svc: svc_delete_socket(%p)\n", svsk);
-
- serv = svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_server;
- sk = svsk->sk_sk;
+ struct svc_serv *serv = xprt->xpt_server;
- svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_ops->xpo_detach(&svsk->sk_xprt);
+ dprintk("svc: svc_delete_xprt(%p)\n", xprt);
+ xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_detach(xprt);
spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
-
- if (!test_and_set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags))
- list_del_init(&svsk->sk_list);
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags))
+ list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_list);
/*
- * We used to delete the svc_sock from whichever list
- * it's sk_ready node was on, but we don't actually
+ * We used to delete the transport from whichever list
+ * it's sk_xprt.xpt_ready node was on, but we don't actually
* need to. This is because the only time we're called
* while still attached to a queue, the queue itself
* is about to be destroyed (in svc_destroy).
*/
- if (!test_and_set_bit(XPT_DEAD, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags)) {
- BUG_ON(atomic_read(&svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_ref.refcount) <
2);
- if (test_bit(XPT_TEMP, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags))
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) < 2);
+ if (test_bit(XPT_TEMP, &xprt->xpt_flags))
serv->sv_tmpcnt--;
svc_xprt_put(&svsk->sk_xprt);
should have been
svc_xprt_put(&xprt);
There might be more errors in the next 15 patches or so; I didn't test
them with this error corrected.
Simon Holm Thøgersen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-27 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 23:15 J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-26 0:15 ` nfs server patches not in 2.6.25 J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-27 20:42 ` Simon Holm Thøgersen [this message]
2008-01-27 22:10 ` nfs server patches for 2.6.25 J. Bruce Fields
2008-01-28 3:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201466543.5006.21.camel@odie.local \
--to=odie@cs.aau.dk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome