From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759806AbYDBAzb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:55:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755308AbYDBAzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:55:23 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:59700 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755657AbYDBAzW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:55:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git) From: Shirley Ma To: Roland Dreier Cc: general@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:55:55 -0700 Message-Id: <1207068955.4593.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 13:02 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > - Multiple CQ event vector support. I still haven't seen any > discussions about how ULPs or userspace apps should decide which > vector to use, and hence no progress has been made since we > deferred this during the 2.6.23 merge window. I did some prototype for IPoIB to enable multiple CQ event support. I did see the approach improved multiple links aggregation performance. I also see some customers' requirements in userspace. I will start the discussion as soon as possible. But it would most likely miss 2.6.26 window. Thanks Shirley