From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756651AbYDDAru (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:47:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751944AbYDDAro (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:47:44 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:57864 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751923AbYDDAro (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:47:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 6] hotplug-memory: use common online_page From: Dave Hansen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Yasunori Goto , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Christoph Lameter In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:47:41 -0700 Message-Id: <1207270061.943.21.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Apart from x86-32, all architectures use an identical online_page. > Define it weakly in mm/memory_hotplug.c so that architectures can > override it if necessary. This is OK, but I do think the __weak stuff can make it a bit counter-intuitive to track down which version is actually getting used. Are there any people the currently override that __weak? If not, we should probably just kill it. -- Dave