From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "mnipxh@163.com" <mnipxh@163.com>,
"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 02:20:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12074796.mAD950pclu@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707143443.GT14598@linux>
On Tuesday, July 07, 2015 08:04:43 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-07-15, 20:43, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >
> > Drivers can store their internal per-policy information in
> > policy->driver_data, lets use it.
> >
> > we have benefits after this replacing.
> > 1) memory saving.
> > 2) policy is shared by several cpus, per_cpu seems not correct. using
> > *driver_data* is more reasonable.
> > 3) fix a memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit. as policy->cpu might
> > change during cpu hotplug. So sometimes we cant't free *data*, use
> > *driver_data* to fix it.
> > 4) fix a zero return value of get_cur_freq_on_cpu. Only per_cpu of
> > policy->cpu is set to *data*, if we try to get cpufreq on other cpus, we
> > get zero instead of correct values. Use *driver_data* to fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Changes from V1:
> > codes style fix, comments update
> > move cpufreq_cpu_put(policy) after we get *driver_data*
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
OK
Does it fix any recent regressions or is it just an old bug?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 12:43 Pan Xinhui
2015-07-07 12:49 ` Pan Xinhui
2015-07-07 14:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-09 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-07-09 1:28 ` Pan Xinhui
2015-07-10 1:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-07 17:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-07-08 4:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-08 12:28 ` Pan Xinhui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12074796.mAD950pclu@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mnipxh@163.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=xinhuix.pan@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®