From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754242AbYDNKKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:10:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751544AbYDNKKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:10:03 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51694 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417AbYDNKKB (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:10:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 From: David Woodhouse To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Xavier Bestel , Alan Cox , Miklos Szeredi , me@bobcopeland.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080414022108.92ce9b1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080413080130.GA9622@infradead.org> <20080413012001.8d7967f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413082815.GA20108@infradead.org> <1208121358.2700.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20080413154459.4b2f125d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413234920.63711ca7@core> <20080413161014.cb06964c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1208161859.3596.75.camel@skunk.anacadf.mentorg.com> <20080414014445.5b4a7b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414090945.GA18494@infradead.org> <20080414022108.92ce9b1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:09:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1208167786.31695.34.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 02:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:09:45 -0400 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > the lastet crap code from the corporate drones. > > That's about the fourth time you've made this assertion. It is pointless, > it is of no use to anyone and it is unjustly insulting to a large number of > kernel developers. No, it isn't. Christoph can be insulting sometimes, but that wasn't it. Anyone who thinks that Christoph was referring to them obviously identifies _themselves_ as 'corporate drone who posts crap code'. Why is it insulting for Christoph to opine that his time is better spent on reviewing something fun? I find it extremely annoying when people claim offence on behalf of unspecified third parties, when no real adult actually _is_ so wet as to have actually been offended. > If you have issues with certain parts of the kernel code then tell us, with > a usable level of detail what they are. Preferably as a reply-to-all prior > to that code being merged, but after merging is fine too. As if Christoph needs encouragement to do just that... :) -- dwmw2