From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758240AbYDXMeX@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758240AbYDXMeX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:34:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752854AbYDXMeN
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:34:13 -0400
Received: from mail.tuxonice.net ([67.207.135.122]:37556 "EHLO
	mail.tuxonice.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752810AbYDXMeN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:34:13 -0400
X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000006
Subject: Should I bother with another attempt at merging TuxOnIce?
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Reply-To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:35:24 +1000
Message-Id: <1209040524.1028.7.camel@nigel-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi all.

I guess the topic pretty much summarises my question.

TuxOnIce has a lot of worthwhile improvements over mainline (I won't
list them unless asked) and I'd still like to see it merged. I don't,
however, have the time or energy to put into trying to incrementally
modify swsusp to match.

Regards,

Nigel