From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763182AbYEEX6V (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 19:58:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753915AbYEEX6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 19:58:13 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:31401 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753906AbYEEX6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 19:58:13 -0400 Subject: Re: x86: Clean up computation of HPET .mult variables From: Daniel Walker To: "Carlos R. Mafra" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20080505231016.GA29072@beyonder.ift.unesp.br> References: <20080505231016.GA29072@beyonder.ift.unesp.br> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 16:58:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1210031888.17132.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 20:11 -0300, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > - tmp = (u64)hpet_period << HPET_SHIFT; > - do_div(tmp, FSEC_PER_NSEC); > - clocksource_hpet.mult = (u32)tmp; > + clocksource_hpet.mult = div_sc(hpet_period, FSEC_PER_NSEC, HPET_SHIFT); > There's helper functions that should be used called clocksource_hz2mult and one called clocksource_khz2mult. I think they're more accurate than using div_sc. Daniel