From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761109AbYFHKHq (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:07:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756171AbYFHKHi (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:07:38 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46502 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756086AbYFHKHh (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:07:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 09/25] fix pagecache reclaim referenced bit check From: Peter Zijlstra To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, mbligh@mbligh.org In-Reply-To: <20080606210858.32fd6f48@bree.surriel.com> References: <20080606202838.390050172@redhat.com> <20080606202858.867179392@redhat.com> <20080606180451.31f01e70.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606210858.32fd6f48@bree.surriel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:02:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1212919326.19205.99.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 21:08 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:04:51 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Changelog should spell all this out, I guess. > > It's not the Changelog I'm worried about as much as the > people who are trying to read the code afterwards. Guess what these people turn to when they look for the rationale of a change? - the Changelog :-)