From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
hugh@veritas.com
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] x86: change __setup_vector_irq with setup_vector_irq
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:16:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213021018-14159-10-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213021018-14159-9-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>
We create a version of it for i386, and then take the CONFIG_X86_64
ifdef out of the game. We could create a __setup_vector_irq for i386,
but it would incur in an unnecessary lock taking. Moreover, it is better
practice to only export setup_vector_irq anyway.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c | 5 +++++
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c | 9 ++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 11 ++---------
include/asm-x86/hw_irq.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
index 9dbe7e9..7fc071f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
@@ -1209,6 +1209,11 @@ static int assign_irq_vector(int irq)
return vector;
}
+
+void setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
+{
+}
+
static struct irq_chip ioapic_chip;
#define IOAPIC_AUTO -1
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c
index 5ea376d..97d67c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
cpus_clear(cfg->domain);
}
-void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
+static void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
{
/* Initialize vector_irq on a new cpu */
/* This function must be called with vector_lock held */
@@ -803,6 +803,13 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
}
}
+void setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
+{
+ spin_lock(&vector_lock);
+ __setup_vector_irq(smp_processor_id());
+ spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
+}
+
static struct irq_chip ioapic_chip;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 50d307e..9d8dfec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -329,15 +329,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
* smp_call_function().
*/
lock_ipi_call_lock();
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- spin_lock(&vector_lock);
-
- /* Setup the per cpu irq handling data structures */
- __setup_vector_irq(smp_processor_id());
- /*
- * Allow the master to continue.
- */
- spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
+ setup_vector_irq(smp_processor_id());
#endif
cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
unlock_ipi_call_lock();
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/hw_irq.h b/include/asm-x86/hw_irq.h
index 1428b41..18f067c 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/hw_irq.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/hw_irq.h
@@ -97,9 +97,9 @@ extern void (*const interrupt[NR_IRQS])(void);
#else
typedef int vector_irq_t[NR_VECTORS];
DECLARE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq);
-extern void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu);
extern spinlock_t vector_lock;
#endif
+extern void setup_vector_irq(int cpu);
#endif /* !ASSEMBLY_ */
--
1.5.4.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-09 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-09 14:16 [PATCH 0/15] Improve x86 smpboot integration Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86: use stack_start in x86_64 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86: don't use gdt_page openly Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86: remove early_gdt_descr reference Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86: move x86_64 gdt closer to i386 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86: use initial_code for i386 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86: boot secondary cpus through initial_code Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86: clearing io_apic harmless for x86_64 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86: remove ifdef from stepping Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86: provide connect_bsp_APIC for x86_64 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86: move enabling of io_apic to prepare_cpus Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86: change naming to match x86_64 Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86: remove cpu from maps Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86: move cpu_exit_clear to process_32.c Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: take load_sp0 out of smpboot.c Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 15:23 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86: move enabling of io_apic to prepare_cpus Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-09 15:52 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 19:44 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 20:12 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-09 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-09 21:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-10 2:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-10 5:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-10 13:00 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-10 13:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-10 19:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-10 19:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-10 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-11 0:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-11 2:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-11 12:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-09 21:02 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 15:23 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86: remove early_gdt_descr reference James Bottomley
2008-06-09 15:49 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 17:20 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-09 17:23 ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-09 17:40 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213021018-14159-10-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com \
--to=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®